Esther Happacher - University of Innsbruck, Institut für Italienisches Recht

Maria Bertel - University of Innsbruck, Institut für Öffentliches Recht, Staats- und Verwaltungslehre

Name of the act/s*

Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Epidemiegesetz 1950 und das Apothekengesetz geändert werden (16. COVID-19-Gesetz)

Subject area

Covid-19

Brief description of the contents of the act

The Federal law modifies the Federal Law on Epidemics from the year 1950 by introducing provisions for public events.

Comment

The 16th Covid-19-Law regarding the Federal Law on Epidemics has been blocked by the Federal Council in particular on behalf of the provisions regarding the use of an obligatory tracking app when participating in public events as well as provisions excluding certain groups of persons from public events based on a risk evaluation related in particular to their  age. Several provisions have been deemed inconstitutional in relation to fundamental rights and the discretion given to administrative authorities when executing the provisions. The National Council has deliberated a second time, therefore overruling the Federal Council.

*Act citation /year and number

BGBl I Nr. 43/2020

Enacted by

Federation

Official link to the text of the act

https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/I/2020/43/20200514

Name of the act/s*

Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Einkommensteuergesetz 1988, das Umsatzsteuergesetz 1994, die Bundesabgabenordnung, das Zahlungsbilanzstabilisierungsgesetz, das Bundesgesetz über die Errichtung eines COVID-19-Schulveranstaltungsausfall-Härtefonds (COVID-19-Schulstornofonds-Gesetz), das Bundesgesetz über die Einrichtung einer Abbaubeteiligungsaktiengesellschaft des Bundes (ABBAG-Gesetz) und das Bundesgesetz, mit dem eine Ermächtigung zur Verfügung über Bundesvermögen erteilt wird, geändert werden sowie das Bundesgesetz über die Prüfung von Förderungen des Bundes aufgrund der COVID-19-Pandemie (COVID-19-Förderungsprüfungsgesetz – CFPG) erlassen wird (18. COVID-19-Gesetz)

Subject area

Covid-19

Brief description of the contents of the act

The Federal law contains provisions on financial and fiscal measures in form of a collective law.

Comment

The 18th Covid-19-Law on financial and fiscal measures has been blocked by the Federal Council on behalf of its collective nature. The National Council has deliberated a second time, therefore overruling the Federal Council.

*Act citation /year and number

BGBl I Nr. 44/2020

Enacted by

Federation

Official link to the text of the act

https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/I/2020/43/20200514

Name of the act/s*

VfGH 16.06.2020, V 432/2020 (decision)

Subject area

COVID 19; Art 45 EU Fundamental Rights Charter; Art 17 EU Fundamental Rights Charter, Art 1 1st Additional Protocol to the ECHR

Brief description of the contents of the act

The applicant challenged the regulation of the minister of health (Verordnung des Bundesministers für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz über Maßnahmen bei der Einreise aus Nachbarstaaten, BGBl. II 87/2020, idF BGBl. II 92/2020, BGBl. II 104/2020, BGBl. II 111/2020, BGBl. II 129/2020, BGBl. II 149/2020, BGBl. II 195/2020, BGBl. II 218/2020, BGBl. II 233/2020, BGBl. II 242/2020 and BGBl. II 263/2020) regarding quarantine rules when entering Austria on the grounds of Art 139 Austrian Federal Constitutional Act.

Comment

The applicant is living in Austria and the owner of a sailing yacht in Croatia. The above-mentioned regulation foresaw a quarantine or a COVID-19 test for people entering Austria. This meant that in case the applicant traveled to Croatia to take care of his yacht he would have to undergo quarantine or do a COVID-19 test when coming back to Austria. The applicant claimed that the regulation was unconstitutional, because of an alleged violation in Art 45 EU FRC (freedom of movement) and Art 17 EU FRC, Art 1st Additional Protocol to the ECHR, Art 5 Basic Law on the General Rights of Nationals (property). Moreover, according to the applicant, the regulation did not distinguish between the epidemiological situation in different countries.

The Court dismissed the case on formal grounds (scope of appeal too narrow).

*Act citation /year and number

VfGH 16.06.2020, V 432/2020 (decision)

Enacted by

Constitutional Court

Official link to the text of the act

https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/VfGH_Beschluss_V_432_2020.pdf

Name of the act/s*

Ra 2017/11/0093-0094, Ra 2017/11/0098, January 30th 2020

Subject area

DIRECTIVE 96/71/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services

Brief description of the contents of the act

The Supreme Administrative Court decided that the employees of the train caterer of the Austrian train company do not underly directive 96/71 EC.

Comment

The applicant, a train caterer, contested a fine he had obtained earlier. The fine was based on the Austrian “Arbeitsvertragsrecht-Anpassungsgesetz”, which aims at reducing so-called “wage dumping” (Lohndumping) and “social dumping” (Sozialdumping). The Administrative High Court referred the case to the ECJ in order to find out whether the directive 96/71/EC applied to the case. After the ECJ´s decision in the “Dobersberger” case (C-16/18) of 16th of December 2019 it was clear, that if the work of a person does not have a sufficient link to the territory of a State in which he does not usually work, this person is not a posted worker according to the directive.

This was the case for the employees of the Austrian train caterer. Amongst others, they started and ended their work in Hungary.

The Supreme Administrative Court therefore decided on the merits of the case and lifted the fine.

Enacted by

Supreme Administrative Court

Official link to the text of the act

 https://www.vwgh.gv.at/rechtsprechung/aktuelle_entscheidungen/ra_2017110093.pdf?7hjvl4

Name of the act/s*

Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Strafgesetzbuch, das Gesetz über das Bundesamt zur Korruptionsprävention und Korruptionsbekämpfung und die Strafprozeßordnung 1975 zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie über die strafrechtliche Bekämpfung von gegen die finanziellen Interessen der Union gerichtetem Betrug geändert werden

Subject area

Criminal Law, European Union

Brief description of the contents of the act

The Federal law implements the Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law by introducing new criminal offences in the area of corruption, fraud in public procurement procedures and money laundering.

Comment

 

Secondary sources/ doctrinal works (if any)

 

*Act citation /year and number

BGBl. I Nr. 111/2019

Enacted by

Federation

Official link to the text of the act

https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/I/2019/111/20191227

Osservatorio sulle fonti

Rivista telematica registrata presso il Tribunale di Firenze (decreto n. 5626 del 24 dicembre 2007). ISSN 2038-5633.

L’Osservatorio sulle fonti è stato riconosciuto dall’ANVUR come rivista scientifica e collocato in Classe A.

Contatti

Per qualunque domanda o informazione, puoi utilizzare il nostro form di contatto, oppure scrivici a uno di questi indirizzi email:

Direzione scientifica: direzione@osservatoriosullefonti.it
Redazione: redazione@osservatoriosullefonti.it

Il nostro staff ti risponderà quanto prima.

© 2017 Osservatoriosullefonti.it. Registrazione presso il Tribunale di Firenze n. 5626 del 24 dicembre 2007 - ISSN 2038-5633